This class is about you and your future. This blog will allow you to think about topics and how they relate to you. This site is for you to read, think, write and discuss your opinions and thoughts
Mrs Lisa Rowland: lrowland@middletowncityschools.com
From the article, I can say that if you invested in the Democrats then it would be very helpful on the American's pocketbook. What interested me was that the Republicans actually had the most consistent numbers, of course with the exceptions of Nixon, Bush, and Hoover.
Haha, I think it's funny that with George H.W. Bush, the rate goes up, but with plain old Bush, the rate goes down. Like father, like son, maybe not. But I think it's a safe bet to invest in the Democrats. If you want a little extra spare change, that is.
That's alot of money. i wish the article would have given me more. I feel like it left alot to be desired. Although it was an interesting senerio, and the charts were good i was bored with the article its self.
That is A LOT of money! I agree with lauren and say that its a good idea to invest in the Democrats if you want a little extra money and not worry about things money wise.
In other words this means stick with the democrats when investing. I must say I thought it was pretty funny how there was a pretty big difference in George W Bush's rate and his fathers.
I just find this article very interesting because people always have their opinions of presidents and the job they have done. People see some presidents such as clinton as bad presidents but really he was an economic savant.
I believe in Democrats all the way. It seems like they are always the ones to get our country's out the slumps. My best suggestion would be to get on their team if you love money:)
From the little information this article has given, it looks like Democrats have been better for American pocketbooks and capitalism. I would have definently fared Democrats, since they were continueing to grow.
12 comments:
From the article, I can say that if you invested in the Democrats then it would be very helpful on the American's pocketbook. What interested me was that the Republicans actually had the most consistent numbers, of course with the exceptions of Nixon, Bush, and Hoover.
Haha, I think it's funny that with George H.W. Bush, the rate goes up, but with plain old Bush, the rate goes down. Like father, like son, maybe not. But I think it's a safe bet to invest in the Democrats. If you want a little extra spare change, that is.
Basically, Stick With The Democrats. If You Wanna Keep Money And Make Things Worth While, Your Best Bet Is To Roll With Them.
That's alot of money. i wish the article would have given me more. I feel like it left alot to be desired. Although it was an interesting senerio, and the charts were good i was bored with the article its self.
That is A LOT of money! I agree with lauren and say that its a good idea to invest in the Democrats if you want a little extra money and not worry about things money wise.
I think the article is too short but the table helped to explain a lot. But anyway, I would have invested in the Democrats to save extra money.
In other words this means stick with the democrats when investing. I must say I thought it was pretty funny how there was a pretty big difference in George W Bush's rate and his fathers.
I just find this article very interesting because people always have their opinions of presidents and the job they have done. People see some presidents such as clinton as bad presidents but really he was an economic savant.
I believe in Democrats all the way. It seems like they are always the ones to get our country's out the slumps. My best suggestion would be to get on their team if you love money:)
From the little information this article has given, it looks like Democrats have been better for American pocketbooks and capitalism. I would have definently fared Democrats, since they were continueing to grow.
Post a Comment